Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
Now this was powerful, however don’t you think that once we have stepped out of the boat that it is now our responsibility to offer support, lead, and “be the parent” to the ship or the rest of us who stay behind in church?
Peter never really left the boat to go off on his own, but remained commissioned to be at the helm?
I guess we need to ask ourselves what is it that Jesus would now have us do? Go back to the boat? Or remain a free spirit?
At a personal level I would appreciate if all those who left the boat could come back and bring new ideas into the church and perhaps some more love and common sense to those who stayed behind.
Thanks yet again!!
My apologies to Bill Reel. I have disagreed with him on many things in a very unchristlike fashion. The Beatles were right ‘all you need is love.” Sorry Bill
I would like to hear more about what happened that led to this comment. Would love to hear more of your journey!
Nice parable analysis.
Winds of change a blowin?
Don’t make waves, or…
Time to graduate from primary?
Thank you for putting into words precisely what I have been feeling. I’ve been taught all my life that I need the captain and the ship to ensure I return home safely, but I’ve recently realized that my relationship with my Savior is strongest when I go to him directly and avoid the middle man.
I’m grateful the captain and boat got me here, but I’ll be taking this next step onto the water. If I sink, I’ll swim until his hand pulls me up. The intent of those in the boat is to go to the same destination as I, so while we will not be far distanced I wish to walk ahead of the ship with the Savior where I am closest to him and still able to help my loved ones in the boat when they need me.
Until now my metaphor has been hiking up the path and having Christ calling me to run. As I ran ahead to meet him those with me on the path worry about my haste and call saying I’ll trip and fall. What they don’t see is how clean and clear the path is up ahead. When I’m with my Savior I’ll be in a better position than back with a tour guide I no longer need. My view from up the hill is clearer and my communication with the Savior easier.
I’ll be borrowing your metaphor from now on, I think it will be easier to understand and contrasts so well with Ballard’s talk that never sat right with me.
Thank you again for this podcast. It’s extremely relevant to me at this point in my journey.
Once you have walked on the water with Jesus, you are not the same. You can go back in the boat knowing that you are not tied to the boat. It has it’s good uses and you can help, but you are free.